The Ultimate Zapper
The World's Best
Hobby Zapper

David Etheredge has a Pet Zapper.
I have a Hobby Zapper.

INDEX

1. PREFACE -- here

2. INTRODUCTION -- here

3. I SHRED HIS "not so ultimate" ZAPPER PAGE -- here

4. DAVID ETHEREDGE NAQ -- NEVER ASKED QUESTIONS -- here

5. PARAZAPPER -- DECEPTIVE MARKETING EXPOSE -- here

1. PREFACE

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor
Exodus 20:16

Never mind the truth
Let's talk about something important

ParaZapper's David Etheredge has an awesome record of dishonesty. After he "accidentally" endorsed The Ultimate Zapper he saw he was sending me customers. So he announced I made up all the testimonials in The Archive. Then he created an anti Ultimate Zapper page calling The Ultimate Zapper a "cheaply made hobby zapper". Then he "borrowed" three of my zapper's features for his new model and renamed it "ultimate". Hmmm.

The Ultimate Zapper has thousands of satisfied customers and a return rate of less than 1%. No wonder David Etheredge is trying to copy it. He calls me a "shade tree mechanic". Must be a lovely shade tree I'm under. By the way, David Etheerdge's new zapper is actually not a zapper at all. It is a frequency generator -- a very expensive and complicated device to use as you will see by reading #4 and #5 on my FAQ Page.

"Shocking Reports"

David Etheredge doesn't mention the positive news about The Ultimate Zapper on Curezone and 458 unsolicited testimonials in The Archive. He has a better idea. Defamation. He recently found a fraudulent "shocking report" about The Ultimate Zapper on a phoney "complaint site" owned by criminals. He put links to this "report" on his site.

When the "report" appeared on his site his creative use of mathematics transformed it into several "reports". At the very end of his discussion about the now-plural "reports" he casually noted some had magically disappeared. But he "forgot" to mention that "complaint sites" which never remove "reports" did so very quickly in this case after I proved fraud which could have led to legal problems for them.

Perhaps there is work for David Etheredge at the National Enquirer. I wonder if he will fool customers like wellness_woman who posted on Curezone (below). He is fighting a losing battle with the truth. I didn't recover from incurable diseases by accident -- and for every disgruntled competitor there are 1000s of satisfied customers of The Ultimate Zapper.

Curezone posting

From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1687062

I'm on day three of using the Ultimate Zapper after a week on the Dr. Hulda Clark parasite cleanse (separate black hull tincture, wormwood, cloves). I've been cleansing for years, including colonics, and while I cannot compare zappers, I can say that the results for me with this particular zapper are very dramatic even after such a short time ... I wish I had done this years ago.

wellness_woman
Oct. 9, 2010

David Etheredge says whatever it takes to help him reach his stated goal -- to be #1 in zapper sales. That includes misrepresenting his credentials on Curezone and his site where he has been calling himself an electrical engineer for 10 years. He is not an electrical engineer. His resume states "self taught in electronics". To project an air of authority he refers to himself as "we". Since I revealed all this he has been trying to defend himself on his site.

I shred his anti Ultimate Zapper page here. Read an expose of his unethical business practices here.

2. INTRODUCTION

ParaZapper's David Etheredge came out of the barracks a number of years ago. He launched an unprovoked attack against The Ultimate Zapper, lying about about my site, my zapper and my work on his site and Curezone. He has recently ramped up his campaign by dedicating a web page that tries to discredit The Ultimate Zapper. He casts truth to the wind -- and turns his page into a marketing ploy.

The Ultimate Zapper is actually a "hobby zapper" according to David Etheredge. And I am "a shade tree mechanic". Well, it must be the best darned hobby zapper in the world. He has "borrowed" 3 of its features for him new model. David Etheredge says he is an "electrical engineer". Well, not really. That is what he has been saying for 10 years on Curezone and his website but his resume actually says "self taught". Hmmm. He calls his ParaZapper a pet zapper but then he says it should not be used on pets -- or people. Hmmm. Maybe it will work on house plants. If it does, David Etherdge's zapper can joint the ranks of hobby zappers.

This page talks about the real David Etheredge -- the David Etheredge who has totally discredited himself. The more he goes after The Ultimate Zapper the worse things get for him. What goes around comes around. He has not discovered the universal truth that untruth comes back to those who foster it. Read my shredding of his anti Ultimate Zapper page (below).

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor
Exodus 20:16

Is David Etheredge
anti Ultimate Zapper or
pro Ultimate Zapper?

Actually, it looks like David Etheredge can't decide if he is for or against The Ultimate Zapper. If you believe what he says he is actually for and against it at the same time. This is a show of amazing ambivalence. He endorsed The Ultimate Zapper a few years ago on Curezone but then it dawned on him that this was not good for business. He has been trying to retract his endorsement ever since. The main focus of his negative campaign has shifted from Curezone to his anti Ultimate Zapper page. It was originally called the "not so ultimate zapper" page -- in lower case. He recently changed the name of his page to "their Ultimate Zapper". I wonder who "their" is? Oh, he must be referring to me.

My name is Ken Presner
and my zapper is called The Ultimate Zapper

I hereby give David Etheredge official permission to use my legal name -- Ken Presner. Actually, my name is registered as Kenneth Presner so if he prefers to call me Kenneth that's fine. He can also refer to me as "he" or "him" if he wishes. I think it's obvious that mentioning me by name is a big problem for David Etheredge -- as if doing so would cast a spell over everything he is doing to try to discredit me and my zapper.

Calling The Ultimate Zapper by its actual name -- using three capital letters -- is also a big problem for him. He has always been "spelling challenged". If he is worried that calling my zapper by its name could put him into anaphalactic shock perhaps he should seek medical attention before considering taking such a drastic action. Perhaps an antihistamine would provide temporary relief from this terrible affliction.

In case David Etheredge does decide to call me by my name and to call my zapper by its name, may I point out that my zapper is called The Ultimate Zapper -- not Ultimate Zapper without The at the beginning -- and not "ultimate zapper" in lower case and not "the Ultimate Zapper" with a small t instead of The. I realize David Etheredge is a spelling-challenged person so I do not take personal offense.

David Etheredge's use of misnaming is a cunning ploy to try to turn my zapper's name into a generic term that anyone can take as their own -- including him -- which he is actually in the process of doing. He is taking the name of my zapper for is own. Arthur Doerksen tried this a few years ago. It was a disaster for him and he quickly dropped the attempt. Anyone can call their zapper "an ultimate zapper". The only problem is that there is only one zapper called The Ultimate Zapper -- a name that David Etheredge appears to have a severe allergy to -- unless he can somehow find a way to magically transmute the word Ultimate to his own zapper.

David Etheredge:
The Ultimate Zapper is not so ultimate
-- but I've got one too, so buy mine

Please don't misunderstand. David Etheredge is not actually stealing the name of my zapper. He is just "borrowing" it by creating his "beyond the Ultimate Zapper" model. He says his zapper is the real Ultimate Zapper. It remains to be seen how long he intends to borrow my name for. I am flattered that he is trying to imitate the highly successful Ultimate Zapper that I have been selling since 1996. The Ultimate Zapper was one of the very first zappers to be marketed on a website. David Etheredge tagged along a few years later.

Despite all his efforts, his stable of zappers has not been able to cut much mustard. So he needs a stable of zappers. I also note that he has quite a few mirror sites. He has not been able to create one winner so he takes the shot-gun approach. I don't believe in shot guns. It's hard to hit the bullseye with all that shot flying around. I believe in a high-velocity weapon. I have one. It's called The Ultimate Zapper.

David Etheredge has an exquisite talent for turning logic completely on its head when it suits his purposes. A perfect case in point is that he has gone to the trouble to try to incorporate 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's features into a new ParaZapper -- but then denies he is doing this because it makes his zapper any better. In fact, he says it does not make his zapper any better at all and that his customers don't even want these not-so-ultimate features that he has gone to the trouble to add to his zapper.

He says he is only offering these features because he wants to give his customers extra choices even though his customers are telling him they don't want these new choices and he says they add nothing to his zapper. His hope is that, by going to all this trouble, he will be able to take sales away from The Ultimate Zapper. He hopes that those foolish enough to believe the 368 testimonials in the Testimonial Archive on my site -- including the amazing testimonial of actress Karen Allen and testimonials from medical doctors and other practitioners -- will turn to him for salvation. He hopes.

ParaZapper Poppycock

It is clear that David Etheredge wants to capture as many of my prospective customers as he can before they order my zapper -- by trying to copy 3 of its features. What a pathetic ploy -- with the convoluted Etheredge poppycock talk surrounding it. Well, people are not so easily fooled. People who visit zapper sites see right through David Etheredge. They send me emails that he is totally transparent.

But David Etheredge is not only transparent. He reminds me of Richard Nixon. "If you don't like my policies I have other policies." Here is a list that follows the evolution of the spectrum of nonsense that has for years been emanating from David Etheredge in his vain effort to talk down the phenomenal success of The Ultimate Zapper.

David Etheredge:

1. How can The Ultimate Zapper give meaningful results? Its a cheaply made hobby zapper.

It's all about the quality.

2. The Ultimate Zapper does not do as much as it claims. How can it?

It's all about effectiveness.

3. The Ultimate Zapper is all hype.

It's all about hype.

4. OK, so maybe The Ultimate Zapper feels like it does some good but it's all in your head.

It's all about the placebo effect.

5. OK, so The Ultimate Zapper does some good. But it's too expensive no matter how much good it does.

It's all about the price.

6. The Ultimate Zapper's advanced square wave is no good. It does not conform to Hulda Clark's specifications.

It's all about the specifications.

7. The Ultimate Zapper's square wave has a short spike below the zero line. That's no good. Hulda Clark said so.

It's all about the square wave.

8. The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter is no good. Hulda Clark said so.

It's all about the AC adapter.

9. The Ultimate Zapper's stainless steel handholds and footpads are no good. Hulda Clark said you have to use copper for conductivity.

It's all about copper.

10. Hulda Clark said ... and she said ... and she said ...

It's all about Dr. Hulda Clark.

11. It's all about yada, yada, yada ...

David Etheredge is like a chameleon. He says it's all about the quality. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the effectiveness. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about hype. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the placebo effect. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the price. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the specifications. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the square wave. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about the AC adapter. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about copper. You don't buy that? OK then. It's all about Dr. Hulda Clark. You don't buy that? Hmmm. Makes ya wanna think this over for a while, doesn't it?

You can quote Hulda Clark till you are blue in the face. The only problem is that she wrote The Cure for All Cancers but she died of cancer. Hmmm. Makes ya wanna think over all that quoting of Dr. Hulda Clark, doesn't it?

Here is an email that I recently received that is typical of the emails I receive every day 365 days a year. Unfortunately for David Etheredge, these kinds of comments do not reflect his agenda and all the "complaints" he is receiving about The Ultimate Zapper. How can David Etheredge possibly explain this glaring contradiction? It's obvious. He doesn't even try because there is no reconciling what he is reporting with the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. So, who are we to believe -- customers who get great results and say The Ultimate Zapper is amazing or a competitor who has a "list" trying to convince people they've got it all wrong? Makes ya wanna think about David Etheredge a bit, doesn't it?

Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:50:32 -0700 From: xxxxxxxx
Subject: Hi Ken
To: kenpresner@hotmail.com

Hi Ken, It's John your old zapper client friend from Toronto. I want to say that the zapper is the best money spent, me and my mom get lots of help from it ...

Thanx

The more David Etheredge attacks my work
and tries to copy my zapper
the more orders I get

All of David Etheredge's efforts to duplicate the amazing effectiveness of The Ultimate Zapper have failed. He must be frustrated. Why else would he continue his unrelenting smear campaign against my work for so many years? Unfortunately, defamation is not the road to success. In an obvious act of desperation he has resorted to taking 3 of my zapper's features to try to duplicate it -- and he is even trying to take the name of my zapper. Arthur Doerksen of Auto-Zap tried the same thing years ago with his own project to take the name of The Ultimate Zapper. He quickly abandoned his plans once he saw the impending disaster he was creating. I give him credit for backing away from the edge of the cliff. Imitation is actually the sincerest form of flattery. It brings a lot of visitors to my site -- and a lot more orders. I actually owe David Etheredge a debt of gratitude. By trying to take a piggy-back on the name of my zapper he is actually drumming up business for me. These are good days.

But David Etheredge has created problems for himself not only by these shenanigans and other serious ethical issues but also by misrepresenting health issues and his own credentials which I have already exposed -- to his chagrin. After all these years it is a shame he has not risen to a higher level with a sense of grace -- and a greater perspective on how to go about things the right way. Alas, respond I must to his lies lest people be deceived into taking take his word as the truth.

The Bottom Line

A virtual mountain of hard evidence in support of the phenomenal success of The Ultimate Zapper has emerged over the past 15 years as you can see by reading this site. The logical explanation for David Etheredge's anti Ultimate Zapper campaign is that The Ultimate Zapper has produced an ultimate thorn in David Etheredge's side. But I believe it goes deeper than that -- to a level of consciousness and spiritual awareness.

You would think David Etheredge would spend his time focusing on his business. HIs problem is he has not been able to create a winner. All his models are weak -- including his latest -- as The Charts clearly show. David Etheredge seems to be hopelessly confused. This is from his site: "We have several models of Zappers sold not for use on pets or farm animals. These devices are not sold for use on humans." Huh? A site called Pet Zapper with zappers not sold for pets -- or for humans? Are his zappers meant to be used on plants or pet rocks?

David Etheredge has become the ultimate jealous competitor. But there is only one Ultimate Zapper -- upper case -- and it is definitely not on David Etheredge's ParaZapper site. His smear campaign is not only aimed at my zapper it is aimed at discrediting me personally. The Ultimate Zapper has earned a well-deserved reputation, a reputation that David Etheredge is obviously envious of and is trying his best to tarnish -- to no avail. On the contrary, he has failed miserably. Nothing David Etheredge says or will ever say can erase the fact that The Ultimate Zapper is by far the best zapper in the world. And nothing David Etheredge says or will ever say can erase the fact that I overcame Multiple Sclerosis and near-death from Crohn's disease and have been helping people recover their health for 15 years. That's the bottom line. Read more.

3. David Etheredge's
anti Ultimate Zapper page
shredded -- line by line

David Etheredge must think that visitors to zapper sites are stupid. I can tell him one thing with total assurance -- they are not. 15 years of experience in the zapper business has shown me that people shopping for a zapper are intelligent and very discerning. I am often asked, "why do you even bother answering David Etheredge of ParaZapper". The answer is simply that I don't like competitors lying about me and my work. I will never let their lies be the last word.

My mother lived to nearly 98. She kept her own apartment and was a fighter to the very end. God bless her. I have good genes and I take after my mother. I am glad to say that most zapper makers are honest and non-confrontational. But there are a few makers who are not, alas. I have been responding to them for years and I am prepared to continue to do so as long as they continue to make dishonest and inane remarks about The Ultimate Zapper and my work.

I work 10 hours a day 365 days a year. I have not taken a day off in over 10 years. I'm in excellent health and I work out everyday. David Etheredge and other misguided competitors are going to need a heck of a lot of stamina to keep up with me. Actually, they haven't got a chance. I overcame MS and Crohn's disease after nearly 7 years of blood, sweat and tears. David Etheredge is not an incurable disease. Not even close. He has no idea who he is dealing with.

Please read my shredding of David Etheredge's anti Ultimate Zapper page below these introductory remarks. His defamatory page shows such blatant dishonesty that it is breathtaking. The intent of his statements is obviously to try to make gullible readers into ParaZapper customers. He has brashly and openly stated his goal on Curezone -- to be #1 in zapper sales. After everything I went through to overcome 2 "incurable" diseases -- Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease -- my goal has always been to help people.

I wonder how many incurable diseases David Etheredge recovered from? Has he recovered from paralysis? Was he near death and did they slice him open from stem to stern and take out large parts of his insides and staple him back together with 29 metal staples with a "good luck" and the promise of an encore within 5 years -- if he made it that far? Does he think he is more qualified than me to give opinions on MS and Crohn's disease? What about other serious illnesses? David Etheredge used to talk about MS and Crohn's on his site but he took all that nonsense down when I showed he had no idea what he was talking about.

Trying to get ahead by floating a pack of lies about my zapper and my work is a failed marketing plan. David Etheredge says whatever it takes to get ahead -- the truth be damned. The facts show he is an unscrupulous and a cunning liar. Cunning is not a substitute for the truth. David Etheredge is totally transparent. The amazing thing is that he thinks he can disguise his this obvious fact.

One of David Etheredge's favorite lies is his authoritative statement that it is impossible for The Ultimate Zapper to create the Electroporation Effect. He refuses to take me my up on my Electroporation Challenge. If he did, he would be talking very differently very quickly. But since the truth might emerge, he can't take that chance. The lies have to be perpetuated. Letting the truth get a foot in the door is no way to do that.

Below, I have cut and pasted the text from David Etheredge's anti Ultimate Zapper page from top to bottom -- line by line. No statement from his page has been omitted. My responses in red follow each section of his text that you will find in quotation marks.

You will note that I have not changed David Etheredge's spelling mistakes and other text errors that his site is by now "famous" for -- including using lower case for the name of The Ultimate Zapper. David Etheredge is "spelling-challenged" Although I must admit his spelling has improved in recent years he still needs help. He used to explain away this sloppiness -- for want of a better word -- by saying he was in a hurry or his keyboard got stuck or he was using an unfamilar computer.

Anyway, I suggested to David Etheredge years ago that he might want to consider getting a proofreader. He has not taken me up on my suggestion. Never mind. I mention this not because it is important in and of itself, I mention it because his sloppiness is a reflection of how he does business. It gets a lot worse. When you read what follows I think you'll get my drift.

1. David Etheredge:

"Their Ultimate Zapper does not meet Dr. Clark's specifications ..."

Ken Presner: Say again? "Their" Ultimate Zapper? The handwriting is already on the wall. Who is "They"? My name is Ken Presner. Not "They". There is no "they" on my site and there never has been. I call David Etheredge by his name and I refer to his site as the "ParaZapper" site -- in upper case. He prefers to call both himself and his site "ParaZapper". Perhaps he has changed his name legally. In any case, he avoids using the name David Etheredge. He has always shown an "attitude" toward me and my site by referring to me as "they" and my zapper as "their ultimate zapper". Actually, my name is Ken Presner and my zapper is The Ultimate Zapper -- in upper case.

David Etheredge prefers to go by the commercial name "ParaZapper" even when he posts to forums. You have to search hard to find the name David Etheredge anywhere. You'd think he has something to hide. Actually, he does have something to hide. When you eventually find his name you can Google it and find that he has been misrepresenting his credentials for over 10 years on his website and on Internet forums. No wonder he wishes to be identified only by his commercial name rather than his real name.

David Etheredge's ParaZapper site is essentially no more than an order page. My site comprises the largest zapper website in the world -- by far -- with about 20 megabytes and 40 webpages. Most of the pages on my site are devoted to health information. Some "pages" run to over 200 book pages, such as the Testimonial Archive with 458 unsolicited testimonials. The name Ken Presner represents not only The Ultimate Zapper website but also someone who overcame 2 "incurable" diseases -- and much, much more -- which David Etheredge avoids talking about except pejoratively. I mean, why talk about anything positive regarding my zapper and my work and my publications when you can talk about "more important" things?

David Etheredge has few choices in his effort to defame. He is forced to compartmentalize to avoid talking about the overwhelmingly positive response to my zapper, my site and my work. Talking about capacitors and resistors and fraudulent "complaint reports" are the only legs he has to stand. And they are pretty shaky legs. They collapse when you rest your arm lightly on the table. David Etheredge ignores the content of my site and my work -- and the positive reponse to them -- as studiously as he ignores my name and the name of my zapper.

I find it interesting that David Etheredge has corporatized his site along with his personal identity by using the ubiquitous name ParaZapper on his site and also on Curezone forums where his ID is ParaZapper. Curezone is a forum that says it forbids the use of its site for commercial purposes and claims it requires a non-commercial logon identity for all posters. In fact, this is a sham. It is a false front than enables people like David Etheredge to ambulance chase on their forums. I stopped posting to Curezone years ago because of this duplicity.

Now let's examine David Etheredge's reference to

"Dr. Clark's specifications"

Let's start off with Dr. Hulda Clark. Who was the "Dr. Hulda Clark" many zapper makers, including David Etheredge, quote religiously. Who was the "doctor" in front of the name Dr. Hulda Clark that zapper makers hope will add a patina of legitmacy to their sites? It sounds good to call your zapper a Dr. Clark Zapper because it sounds impressive to have the appellation "Doctor" in front of the product you are selling. The truth is that Dr. Hulda Clark's doctorate was from an unaccredited distance-learning online natural health "institution" called Clayton College that is no longer in business. Hers was no MIT doctorate. Her reputation must depend on credentials other than her "doctorate", I'm afraid.

And who exactly is David Etheredge? He has been passing himself off as an accredited electrical engineer for 10 years on his website and on Internet forums. But he is not an electrical engineer. David Etheredge has been deliberately misrepresenting his credentials all these years. Since I disclosed this fact there have been no denials from him -- just attempts by him to find ways to put out the fire. More (below) about this. David Etheredge does not have a shred of credibility.

I have never misrepresented my credentials. I overcame 2 incurable diseases, I invented The Ultimate Zapper and I have an ordinary B.A. Those are my credentials. Oh, I also trained as a computer programmer, have worked on a lot of computer programming projects and have worked on electronics projects. And I have a few things I could pull out of my hat that would make David Etheredge go away and hide under a shade tree for a while. But I don't consider them important. The most important thing is that The Ultimate Zapper, along with my my publications and my experience with serious illnesses and diseases have been helping people for the past 15 years. That's my interest and that's my bottom line. The rest is irrelevant to me.

"Dr. Clark's specifications".

It may surprise some people to know that quoting Dr. Clark's specifications is often used by zapper makers to mislead people looking for a zapper. Many competitors tag along after the coattails of Hulda Clark by repeatedly quoting "Dr. Clark's specifications" because it serves their commercial interests. Many competitors pretend to be "unquestioning devotees" of Hulda Clark to promote a fictitious link between themselves and Hulda Clark for commercial purposes. But the fact is that Hulda Clark stated on her site that she did not endorse any zapper or any zapper maker. Here is what she wrote:

"Please keep in mind, however, that no other website speaks for me ... I do not endorse any manufacturer, and I receive no compensation for any product sales by any company. I have no direct influence on any other company, either."

David Etheredge and other zapper makers talk about their "Hulda Clark zappers" and "Dr. Clark's specifications" then turn around and ignore her specifications by changing them to try to create a better zapper. David Etheredge is an obvious example of this kind of hypocrisy and duplicity with his stable of so-called "Hulda Clark zappers". He uses the name Hulda Clark freely -- as well as the false claim of making zappers with "Dr. Clark's specifications" -- like many other zapper makers do -- for commercial gain.

I am not a "devotee" of Hulda Clark's. She did some incredible research and she invented the original zapper. But to treat her work as immutable does a great disservice to people looking for a more complete answer to their health problems -- and to Hulda Clark who was always open to change. It should be noted that she wrote The Cure for All Cancers but in fact she died of cancer in 2009. The cause of her death was misrepresented as a spinal cord injury but her death certificate shows the true cause of death.

It is clear that Hulda Clark did not have all the answers, as some zapper makers would like people to believe. Their interest is in exploiting her name. Casting aspersions on more advanced zappers by saying they do not follow "Dr. Clark's specifications" is hypocritical. David Etherdge makes this accusation against The Ultimate Zapper then turns around and abandons Hulda Clark's specifications in his own zappers. This is typical of David Etheredge's dishonesty in the pursuit of commercial gain -- always done with a tone of authority to put people off the track. Hypocrisy is David Etheredge's calling card.

Hulda Clark invented the original zapper in 1993. She was actually an astute biomedical researcher in Canada for years before obtaining her Clayton College doctorate. A few years ago I sent her a message through her publishing company expressing my personal gratitude to her. But Hulda Clark did not invent electro-medicine and she did not invent the square wave which is the basis of zapper technology. Dr. Royal Raymond Rife was the truly great genius of electro-medicine.

And Hulda Clark never stated that the makers of "Hulda Clark zappers" -- who use her name without her permission -- must never try to improve on her zapper design. She was not doctrinaire nor was she a cultist. She was a researcher and was very open to change. She realized that her zapper was just a starting point. And she recognized that some changes to her original zapper design were already bringing improvements in therapeutic results although she felt constrained to use her original A6 zapper in her daily work for the sake of the continuity of her research.

Let's examine the logic of technological developments in the context of David Etheredge's feigned devotion to "Dr. Clark's specifications". Did the invention of the record disc by Emile Berliner in 1889 define the state of the art of recording media? Did Emile Berliner say "This is the best it gets. No need to go any further."? Did the first computer, the room-filling ENIAC, define the state of the art of computing? Was there no need to go any further? Was the first crystal radio proclaimed as the state of the art in wireless sound transmission? Was there no need to go any further? Were the specifications of these and countless other inventions and innovations ever proclaimed as the end point -- specifications that must be followed unwaveringly and never altered? I mean, it is simply ridiculous when zapper makers talk as though "Dr. Clark's specifications" were written in granite, immutably handed down from the mount. This is not religion. This is technological inovation we're talking about.

The implication of David Etheredge's comment about not following "Dr. Clark's specifications" is self-serving -- as well as inane. In effect, he is saying "improving on Dr. Clark's specifications is against the rules. Now, take a look at my 'improved' zappers. I mean, how dishonest can you get. David Etheredge, like many zapper makers, has become a self-styled Hulda Clark "interpreter" when it suits his commercial agenda.

Actually, Hulda Clark never talked about a specific frequency for zappers. She talked about a frequency range from 25,000 to 30,000 Hertz. And David Etheredge know this very well. Hulda Clark always said that any single frequency will do the work. She later discovered that some of the lower frequencies were more effective than higher frequencies. And she definitely never talked about resistor tolerance because she realized it was not the specific frequency that mattered -- because zappers are not frequency generators. David Etheredge uses the discussion about resistor tolerance as a red herring. He completely misrepresents the facts to further his agenda.

The truth is that David Etheredge has never followed Hulda Clark's specifications, the cornerstone of which was a single high frequency. ParaZapper has always been a dual or multiple frequency zapper. The Ultimate Zapper has always been a single frequency that uses a lower frequency than Hulda Clark's zapper which is more effective than the higher frequencies of "Hulda Clark zappers". Ironically, Hulda Clark knew lower frequencies were more effective than higher frequencies but did not want to get involved in any zapper "controversy". She had a mission and she focused on her work.

David Etheredge has been trying for years to improve on Hulda Clark's design. The result of all his efforts is a confusing collection of models. He has never managed to produce a single winner. He is now trying to copy The Ultimate Zapper by adding 3 of its features to yet one more new model in his stable -- at the same time declaring The Ultimate Zapper "does not meet Dr. Clark's specifications". Then he disclaims the effectiveness of those very features he is "borrowing" from The Ultimate Zapper. I have never heard such a convoluted and inane explanation by a zapper maker in the past 15 years. David Etheredge twists and turns in his vain attempts to defame The Ultimate Zapper while imitating it. He should have been a pretzel maker.

2. David Etheredge:

"... and is cheaply made ..."

Ken Presner: If The Ultimate Zapper is "not so ultimate" -- which was the name of David Etheredge's original anti Ultimate Zapper page (yes, there has been more than one version) -- and if The Ultimate Zapper is made with "the cheapest hobby level parts" then how the heck is it doing all the amazing things that customers report in the Testimonial Archive on my site? He has never answered this obvious question except to keep repeating the same lies he has always repeated about The Ultimate Zapper. There are 458 testimonials that David Etheredge prefers to ignore. He says I made them up. Why is he copying features from a zapper he says is "not so ultimate" and why is he also "borrowing" my zapper's name? An odd thing to do with a zapper you are saying is no good and are going to a lot of trouble to try to defame. Why go to all that trouble if it is no good in the first place?

David Etheredge's modus operandi is to ignore the facts in favor of self-serving fiction. The truth is that he is a jealous competitor who has lost thousands of sales to The Ultimate Zapper that was invented by someone with an ordinary B.A. David Etheredge pretends to be an electrical engineer. He has been parading his false credentials online since the inception of his website and now tries to cover up this lie in response to my recent revelation of this fact by publishing a list of projects he has worked on. Projects? A project is not a degree. I worked on projects. Projects are not degrees. Projects are projects. Does he really think he will be able to fool people with this ploy?

To David Etheredge's dismay, people have been voting with their feet for years in the direction of The Ultimate Zapper. His response has been a level of duplicity -- and vindictiveness -- that is breathtaking. The Ultimate Zapper is called The Ultimate Zapper for a very good reason. It is clearly the best zapper in the world as the Zapper Comparison Charts show. They compare 29 popular zappers using the 11 features that make zappers effective -- some of which David Etheredge is copying, while criticizing them at the same time. Which is one of the reasons I use words like "deception, misrepresentation, duplicity, unscrupulousness, hypocrisy and dishonesty" when I describe how David Etheredge does business. David Etheredge has declared on Curezone that his goal is to be #1 in zapper sales. He continues to live up to his well-deserved reputation to say whatever it takes to get there -- the truth be damned.

The "shocking" photo on David Etheredge's anti Ultimate Zapper page shows a zapper without a printed circuit board. How terrible. I have made no secret of the fact that The Ultimate Zapper is manufactured without a printed circuit board. The only problem is that David Etheredge totally misrepresents the facts about printed circuit boards on his anti Ultimate Zapper page. His habitual way of "informing" people is by misinforming when it comes to that awful competitor who shall go nameless. Here are the facts. Each Ultimate Zapper is hand-made with point-to-point wiring by electronic experts. Point-to-point wiring produces a zapper with the extremely high reliability. The Ultimate Zapper has had only one single failure of a solder joint in 15 years. Contrary to David Etheredge's self-serving statements, attention to detail is the essence of The Ultimate Zapper.

Machine made printed circuit boards -- like those used in ParaZappers -- are much cheaper to make than zappers like The Ultimate Zapper that are made with point-to-point wiring. In fact, there is mounting evidence that high temperatures that machined printed circuit boards are subjected to degrade product quality. David Etheredge points to the neat-looking inside of his zapper as though a printed circuit board guarantees a better zapper. It most certainly does not. Let's examine what printed circuit boards and point-to-point wiring are really all about.

Hand-made zappers have much higher production costs than zappers made with printed circuit boards. The fact is that the cost of producing each Ultimate Zapper by hand is much higher than the cost of producing each ParaZapper by machine. Years ago I rejected using cheap printed circuit boards like those found in ParaZapper in favor of having my production team hand wire each Ultimate Zapper individually.

Like my production team that makes each Ultimate Zapper individually, high-end "boutique" audio manufacturers are taking the time to produce some of the highest quality and most reliable audio products in the world -- by hand. ParaZapper chooses the easy way out -- printed circuit boards. David Etheredge's accusation that The Ultimate Zapper is made of cheap "hobby-level" parts is preposterous. If this were true I would have a high return rate. My return rate is actually less than 1%. As far as I am aware, The Ultimate Zapper has the lowest rate of return of any zapper in the world. And I back my zapper with a 3-month trial offer. And a lifetime warranty.

The New Model SE is not only individually made, it is made with high quality all lead-free components which makes it the most environmentally friendly zapper on the market. It is RoHS compliant for shipment to California and the European Union. The New Model SE uses special silver alloy solder that gives it 40% higher conductivity than the original Ultimate Zapper. Its lead-free silver alloy solder is the most expensive on the market. And The Ultimate Zapper's solder produces superior adhesive quality compared to leaded solder.

The New Model SE is shipped with the most expensive solid copper clips on the market -- not the cheap nickel-plated steel clips that most zappers have. The latter corrode, rust and break off easily. The Ultimate Zapper has the highest quality, most expensive and most reliable switch of its kind of any zapper on the market -- totally contrary to the false statement made by David Etheredge regarding its switch. The box that contains its components is made of the highest quality industrial grade ABS plastic that money can buy. Cheap "hobby-level" parts? Trying to pull the wool over people's eyes by appealing to common ignorance of electronic parts is something David Etheredge excels in -- and spares no opportunity to exploit.

How does this amplfier look to you with
its neat-looking PCB board?

Here's how it looks on the outside.

Looks good. But is it better than an amplifier with point-to-point wiring?

How does this amplifier look to you with
the nest of wires?

Looks pretty bad. But looks can be deceiving. Does this look like the inside of an expensive amplifier? Do these look like expensive parts? It looks like it's cheaply made, doesn't it? The fact is this is a very sophisticated high-end amplifier costing thousands of dollars. There are many high-end "boutique" audio manufacturers that eschew printed circuit boards in favor of point-to-point wiring. They believe point-to-point wiring delivers superior results. I won't get into a discussion of the various merits of each manufacturing method. That would be an unnecessary digression that would put you to sleep. But I will provide some useful links for further inquiry in case you would like to follow this up. Suffice it to say that anyone who represents point-to-point wiring as being inferior is clearly not telling the truth. Period.

Here's how it looks on the outside.

Take a look at the inside of some vintage Marantz amplifiers and receivers. Oooooh. Not a pretty sight. Some of them look just awful. But the sound they produce is sublime -- even after many decades.

Electronics: Truth and deception

I am an audiophile. I have a nice sound system at home -- one of the great pleasures in my life. I listen to music while I work. I use the example of audio electronics here to prove a point that David Etheredge intentionally misrepresents regarding boards and wiring. I think this makes the subject of printed circuit boards and point-to-point wiring a lot easier to understand for those who are not familiar with electronics. David Etheredge's agenda is to make The Ultimate Zapper look bad -- whatever it takes -- even if that means appealing to the ignorance of zapper buyers regarding electronics. He tries to sell those who don't know about electronics on [my quote] "The Ultimate Zapper looks bad inside. And if it looks bad inside it must be bad so I can't recommend it." Yada, yada, yada .... Has anyone asked David Etheredge why he really can't "recommend" The Ultimate Zapper -- beyond his obviously self-serving statements -- as though he were in the zapper recommendation business rather than the zapper manufacturing business? I think the answer is obvious.

But wait. David Etheredge already endorsed The Ultimate Zapper -- unsolicited -- on Curezone. He called it "the best single-frequency zapper". Do you mean to say he is now putting his vehicle in reverse? Who asked him to recommend The Ultimate Zapper in the first place? I never asked him? What competitor actively worries about whether or not he can recommend a competitor's product and takes great pains to defame competitors? David Etheredge twists and turns in a self-styled form of "logic" that is the most convoluted, contradictory and irrational you'll find in Zapperland. Bar none. Take a look at other zapper sites then email me if you find a better example of this anywhere in Zapperland.

3. David Etheredge:

"There are a number of zappers out there and some are good, some are not. This page is to expose the one that may be the greatest rip-off in zappers,"

Ken Presner: Say again? " ... may be the greatest rip-off ... ". Wait a moment. "May be"? What does that mean? "May be not", too? Well, if ever there was a jealous competitor who knew how to sit on the fence his name is certainly David Etheredge. Has even one of the thousands of satisfied customers of The Ultimate Zapper ever made such a statement? On the contrary, those who have benefitted from The Ultimate Zapper have often commented how cheap it is relative to the amazing benefits it has rendered. They have been very grateful for it. You might notice this "rip-off" statement comes from David Etheredge of ParaZapper -- a competitor -- who has the nerve to then turn around and take 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's features for his own zapper. He leaves one breathless at his hypocricy and dishonesty -- not to speak of his inanity.

"based on an exhorbitant price"

Ken Presner: Say again? "... based on ..." yada, yada, yada. David Etheredge, a predatory competitor, states that his latest version of the truth about The Ultimate Zapper is now "based on" his opinion of its price -- when all the other arguments to try to take it down have failed miserably as you can read on  this page. If you don't believe the nonsense about resistors and defamatory "reports" that he writes about then he has a trump card. He doesn't like my price. David Etheredge reminds me of Richard Nixon. If you don't like his policies he has other policies.

Talking about price, feature-for-feature, The Ultimate Zapper represents by far the best value of the 29 most popular zappers on the market as the Zapper Comparison Charts on my site clearly prove. The charts use the 11 features that make zappers effective -- unlike the smoke-and-mirrors charts on other zapper sites. David Etheredge has also complained that the price of My Recovery Protocol is exhorbitant. "Yikes!!" he declared -- at the price of $44.95 for My Recovery Protocol -- 90% of sales receiving a $20 discount which makes the price $24.95 for most people. As I let everyone know, there is also free follow-up for as long as people need it. Exhorbitant. $24.95 and free follow-up. David Etheredge forgot to mention my book has saved many lives for the exhorbitant price of $24.95. $24.95 is way too high a price for getting your life back -- according to David Etheredge who has not read my book yet.

You may find it interesting to know that David Etheredge does not complain about the price of $99.95 for a book written by a convicted felon -- a larcenist turned selfless humanitarian, according to David Etheredge. This $99.95 book happened to mention the word ParaZapper -- whereupon David Etheredge said his phone was ringing off the hook with orders and his unconditional endorsement of the book quickly followed. YOu may be surprised to learn that David Etheredge's larcenist friend is now one of his favorite people.

After all, according to David Etheredge, this great humanitarian has written things you cannot find anywhere else. Of course. So we can forgive him for his little transgressions. Never mind that he is still stealing money from so many people that they have mounted a site against him to document his criminality. He has already spent time behind bars and it looks like there is a good chance he may be headed back to the slammer if he keeps things up. Never mind. To David Etheredge he's a hero.

David Etheredge declares with authority that the information in my book must be overvalued -- if not worthless. Of course, he hasn't actually read my book. Let's not worry about unimportant things. This doesn't stop him from having a very strongly negative opinion about it. My book sells for 25% of the price of the book in which his zapper is mentioned. For the price of $24.95 my work contains information people with MS and Crohn's disease and other serious related illnesses can find no where else and that has helped many people get their lives back. David Etheredge accuses me of ripping off book buyers. If you can find a bigger hypocrite in the zapper business than David Etheredge please email me his name.

"and a lot of hype for so little content."

Ken Presner: Say again? Hype? Does this come from those who have been helped by my book? And I suppose the the 368 unsolicited testimonials in the Testimonial Archive are "hype" as well. Actually David Etheredge says its a lot worse than that. He says I made them up. This is one of the most abominable lies that has come from him. Is the incredible testimonial and radio interview from the actress Karen Allen hype? Is Karen Allen lying? How many people is David Etheredge willing to call liars and accuse of hype? Well, he is apparently willing to call a lot of people liars. And he does so with a straight face -- and his tone of authority. As I have accurately pointed out, David Etheredge will say whatever it takes to be #1 in zapper sales -- the truth be damned.

David Etheredge originally endorsed The Ultimate Zapper on Curezone. He called it "The best single frequency zapper". He has now taken 3 features from The Ultimate Zapper for his own new zapper model -- and turns around and calls The Ultimate Zapper a rip-off? Huh? If there is "so little content" -- whatever that means -- why is he copying it? How can you copy "little content" -- with a straight face? Does this make any sense at all? David Etheredge denies what satisfied users have been reported for the past 15 years about The Ultimate Zapper in the Testimonial Archive in favor of a discussion about capacitors and resistors. After all, he needs something to hang his hat on. Senator Al Franken wrote a book called "Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them".

4. David Etheredge:

"One of our customers told us that they were unhappy with their Ultimate Zapper and that they thought that it was junk. We had them send it and this is what we received. This illustration of the $179.95 Ulitimate [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "Ultimate"] Zapper shows that it is one of the poorest quality zappers that I have ever seen and has a very high price. The maker uses the cheapest hobby level parts for his components and circuits, and even uses cheap lamp cords for his cables."

Ken Presner: Say again? Well, David Etheredge just hit the motherlode. He is only too happy to hear this good news. One of his customers has called The Ultimate Zapper "junk" -- which, if true, overrides thousands of satisfied customers in the eyes of David Etheredge -- and allegedly sends David Etheredge what he happily says is an Ultimate Zapper from 2007 purchased who knows when? Is this is the Ultimate Zapper that David Etheredge is now trying to copy? Hmmm.

I imagine this ParaZapper customer will soon be complaining to David Etheredge that he/she is unhappy with the ParaZapper since David Etheredge is now taking 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's features and cloning them into his ParaZapper. Ah, maybe the printed circuit board is the key to everything. As long as a zapper has a printed circuit board -- and hopefully a complicated one like ParaZapper's -- then all is well even if the zapper is weak -- like the ParaZapper.

Have you noticed how David Etheredge focuses on the cost of parts and how he likes to talk about resistors and capacitors -- but he avoids talking about results and testimonials except to declare with authority that I made up the Testimonial Archive on my site? After all, how could a "hobby level" zapper possibly produce such amazing results? If so, maybe David Etheredge should take up a hobby. The Ultimate Zapper is a heck of a good hobby zapper. Were the Hulda Clark prototypes hobby zappers? I guess they were. Is David Etheredge complaining about them? All of this is as convoluted as David Etheredge can make it -- as well as inane. Who needs the truth, clearly and logically explained? David Etheredge knows that I must have made up the 368 testimonials for my hobby zapper. Who needs the truth when you can talk about more important things?

When we talk about parts and the cost of production, we're talking about carrying a square wave signal through electrodes attached to a pulsing device. In case you were wondering this is not rocket science. The cord used for The Ultimate Zapper is high-conduction multi-strand solid copper cord like most other zappers. Multi-strand solid copper carries signal much more efficiently than single-strand copper cord. In fact, no zapper maker enters the world of "exotic" high-priced cords because it would raise the zapper price without any therapeutic benefit whatsoever. As a signal carrier, The Ultimate Zapper's cord and other components are as efficient as any other zapper on the market -- including David Etheredge's ParaZapper -- despite David Etheredge's protestations to the contrary. He plays to the gullible who are unfamiliar with electronics.

In fact The Ultimate Zapper's signal is far superior to that of other zappers because of the synergy created by its 11-feature formula. The fact is that no zapper maker's product is enhanced one iota by cord. Is David Etheredge implying he uses cryogenically-treated cord or quantum tunneled actively shielded cord or cord that incorporates the latest Bybee quantum nano technology or that his zapper uses special technology to prevent Eddy currents? I -- don't -- think -- so. In fact, David Etheredge wants to give the impression of using superior cord but he does not incorporate one single special feature in his zapper cord. Not one. No zapper maker does. But he makes his cord sound special. David Etheredge knows how to mislead and misrepresent and he takes advantage of every opportunity to do so.

The Ultimate Zapper uses the highest quality ABS plastic box available. It is actually much more compact and much easier to use than ParaZapper's. David Etheredge does not mention this fact. The Ultimate Zapper uses the highest quality, most expensive toggle switch of its kind available. David Etheredge fearlessly declares that The Ultimate Zapper's switch is "cheap". Add one more lie to his long list of lies. The Ultimate Zapper incorporates high quality capacitors and resistors but does not focus on low-tolerance for one simple reason -- because tolerance in a zapper that outputs 2500 Hz. is irrelevant. It is the range that is important. David Etheredge forgot to mention this.

But wait. If you are really marketing a frequency generator, not a zapper -- which is one of the secrets about ParaZapper that David Etheredge conveniently forgets to talk about -- then you do require low-tolerance resistors because of the complexity of using frequency generators. I discuss the expense and the complexity of using a frequency generator at #4 and #5 on my FAQ Page. David Etheredge avoids discussing the complicated truth about frequency generators because discussing all it would be a game-changer. Then the truth would have to come out. He does not go there -- nowhere near there.

You'd think that a hobby zapper would be falling apart pretty quickly -- according to what David Etheredge has to say. I offer a life-time warrany on parts and labor for The Ultimate Zapper. Not bad for a hobby zapper. David Etheredge doesn't make hobby zappers. He makes real zappers. He touts the quality of his zapper and talks down the quality of The Ultimate Zapper but he only offers a 3-year limited warranty -- and he "offers" a punitive returns policy with a 60% return penalty. The Ultimate Zapper has a 3-month trial period with a 15% return fee. It has a rate of return of less than 1%.

You'd think that if David Etheredge had as much confidence in the quality of his zapper as he says he has that he would be offering his customers a lot more in terms of backing up his product than he actually offers -- and that he would show a measure of generosity that has heretofore eluded him. He says he watches post marks on returns very carefully and that the axe falls if he sees a return that is post marked on day 11.

The Ultimate Zapper is a very high quality product whose fame does not rest on its resistors and capacitors that are perhaps ParaZapper's claim to fame according to the emphasis David Etheredge put on those little parts. The Ultimate Zapper's success rests on something bigger -- its results. Which is all that people are interested in. The key to the The Ultimate Zapper's success is its unique 11-feature formula that produces amazing results. Frankly, when people purchase a zapper I don't think they are terribly worried about resistor tolerance. They want to know two things. They want to know if the zapper they are buying will give the results they are looking for and if the maker stands behind his product.

People are looking for results and reliability. Which is why you will never see David Etheredge talking about the results people get with The Utltimate Zapper and its extremely low return rate. He never talks about its success. Does this surprise anyone? He just searches relentlessly for reasons why he cannot recommend it. Recommend it? A competitor is acting as a "recommendation agency" for other zappers? This is totally inane. David Etheredge talks about The Ultimate Zapper's "following". Are people "following" a winner or a loser with The Ultimate Zapper?

Are people "following" my zapper -- like groupies follow a rock star -- or are they "following" it because it gives results? The answer is obvious -- except for David Etheredge, the man on the outlook for new opportunities to defame my zapper, my site, my work -- and me. His agenda is to find ways to distract people from the main event. So he talks about resistors and wires and other things of overriding importance. Who needs to talk about results when you can talk about parts?

It looks like David Etheredge has found a new way to defame The Ultimate Zapper. He is now quoting "reports" from "complaint sites". Too bad these "reports" are actually a single fraudulent "report" and that these wonderful "complaint sites" are owned by criminals. Read the truth about David Etheredge's "shocking revelations" (below). He should write for the National Enquirer.

5. David Etheredge:

"The claim "The photo of the inside of The Ultimate Zapper that he shows on his site looks like one of my 1996 prototypes".

Ken Presner: "The claim"? What claim? It's a fact. It looks like an old model. Unfortunately for David Etheredge, even my older models produced such superior results that they created the wonderful reputation The Ultimate Zapper now enjoys worldwide. The Ultimate Zapper is being used in over 60 countries with a worldwide network of distributors.

6. David Etheredge:

"Actually, the customer that sent it to us bought it from him in 2007, so he was still shipping these over 10 years after he claims that this one was made. Other customers have since made the same complaint. The manufacturer's response is to call names and accuse us of lying."

Ken Presner: What the heck is David Etheredge saying in his convoluted special version of the English language? It looks like he is saying I was shipping 1996 models in 2007. Is he out of his cotton pickin'? David Etheredge has a photo on his anti Ultimate Zapper page showing what looks to be the inside of an old Ultimate Zapper. He says a customer sent it to him in 2007. Well, in case he has not noticed, we are approaching Thanksgiving 2011 and we will soon be into 2012. Who knows what zapper he is showing on his site? It is certainly not the New Model SE. It even has no label. Of course, David Etheredge also wants people to believe The Ultimate Zapper is shipped without a label. Huh? No label?

http://zap.intergate.ca

This reminds me of David Etheredge's fear-mongering about The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter -- and his lying about The Ultimate Zapper's features, those same features he is copying for his own zapper. David Etheredge is the most consistent and consummate liar in the zapper business. For consistency he beats Ken Adachi of so-called "Educate-Yourself" who practices defamation as a career.

7. David Etheredge:

"As for pricing, this zapper should not sell for more than $45 or $50 US. If it was made using the higher quality components and boards that we use, this zapper should sell for less than $80.00 with the AC adapter included. His zapper does include a AC wall adapter that does not meet the IEC 60601 specifications for contact with humans. This could possibly be lethal in some cases."

Ken Presner: Say again? "This zapper"? Oh, David Etheredge must be referring to The Ultimate Zapper. He is now authoritatively stating how much The Ultimate Zapper costs to make and how much I should sell it for. But he has no idea what the cost of parts and production is. He doesn't even know what parts are used in the production of The Ultimate Zapper let alone the details of the cost of production and other business-related costs. Suffice it to say the cost of producing each Ultimate Zapper is higher that the price David Etheredge says I should charge for The Utlimate Zapper. Of course, he would like me to sell The Ultimate Zapper below cost. I would go out of business and he would pick up all sales he has been missing these past years.

"possibly be lethal in some cases."

This is one of David Etheredge's favorite lies. He hopes this one will work when all others fail. Arthur Doerksen of Auto-Zap and David Etheredge have been fear-mongering about The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter for years. The Ultimate Zapper was the first zapper in the world with an AC adapter (in 1996). Many other zapper makers followed my lead. He knows full well that our AC adapter is UL and CSA approved. We have also put our high quality double-insulated AC adapter through exhaustive independent testing. There has never been a single problem with our adapter in 15 years and there never will. Please read more at #16 on the FAQ page on my site. The complete safety of The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter has also been independently corroborated on Curezone -- the forum that David Etheredge likes to frequent -- a good place to ambulance chase.

8. David Etheredge:

"Also, this zapper does NOT meet Dr. Clark's specification for positive offset ( see the images below ). If you buy one from them, take it to an electronics shop and have them open it up for you. Have them check it under human load with an oscilloscope. It dips very negative. We will be happy to hear if he makes a significant improvement but a product with so few components should still sell well less than $45 or $50."

Ken Presner: Surprise. More you-know-what from David Etheredge. Please note that he has "massaged" the oscilloscope views of his own zapper on his anti Ultimate Zapper page by quoting Dr. Hulda Clark -- again. The only problem is that Hulda Clark was wrong when she stated a spike in the square wave has the effect of "sustaining pathogen life". In fact, I have yet to read any scientific description or proof of this anywhere and David Etheredge provides no evidence to support this statement. It is a totally unproved assertion -- with Hulda Clark's name attached to it as proof. Quoting Hulda Clark does not make it true. It is clearly not true. Hulda Clark was wrong about many things. This is one of many things she got wrong.

The fact is that a short spike below the zero line is normal. In fact, there is a short spike at the top and bottom of every zapper wave produced by every zapper from every zapper maker -- including ParaZapper's own zapper wave that you can see below taken from his own site. Here is an email from my production team:

"Hi Ken,

Here is a picture off the ParaZapper website. Notice that his zapper also has an upward spike at the beginnnig and a downward spike at the end of each cycle. I have also noticed this on other square waves that I have measured. It must be a common occurance. I notice too that under load, his zappers' voltage drops quite a bit, unlike ours ...". The drop in voltage with ParaZapper translates into diminished therapeutic effectiveness from an already weak zapper as the Comparison Charts show.

Here is David Etheredge's own oscilloscope photo of the ParaZapper wave taken from his own website:

FROM THE PARAZAPPER SITE



THE PARAZAPPER WAVE
CLEARLY SHOWS THE SPIKE AT THE
TOP AND THE BOTTOM OF THE WAVE

The Ultimate Irony is that while the ParaZapper spikes may diminish the therapeutic effectiveness of its already weak wave form the short spikes at the top and the bottom of The Ultimate Zapper's wave do not diminish its powerful therapeutic effects. We have never received a single email about this from customers of The Ultimate Zapper. Its its wave is very powerful as thousands of users know, to the chagrin of David Etheredge. The difference between the ParaZapper wave and The Ultimate Zapper wave is clearly explained on the Home Page. The Ultimate Zapper New Model SE is the most powerful and effective zapper available. It is 40% more powerful than the original Ultimate Zapper. This is The Ultimate Thorn in the side of David Etheredge.

9. David Etheredge:

"The maker of this unit claiming quality is like a shade tree mechanic claiming that his car is a Rolls Royce. I have seen some hand made units that I would consider to be good quality. This is not one. "

Ken Presner: Say again? The Ultimate Zapper is a very high quality product -- made with high quality parts and assembled by experts. And the results people obtain with it are unequivocal. This is the thorn in the side of David Ethehedge that he will never be able to remove. His "authoritative" comments regarding "shade tree mechanic" are laughable -- a total deception. They bounce like a cat falling from the penthouse.

10. David Etheredge:

"As you can see from this picture of our most affordable $64 model, ParaZapper provides far superior quality and technology. The claim that hand built is good quality can be easily refuted from the photo of the interior of their unit. It can be but it really depends on how it is hand built and the components that go into it. We use the highest quality green boards and higher quality components that meet ROHS requirements. This model has an almost zero failure rate, less than 1 failure in 5000 units sold. Our machining processes do not create excess heat or damage to the components."

Ken Presner: Say again? "Quality and technology"? Since when does the photo of a printed circuit board prove one product is better than another"? If ParaZapper's technology is so superior then why is he taking 3 features from The Ultimate Zapper for his opwn zapper -- a zapper he says is inferior? This will presumably make his own zapper inferior. Does this make any sense at all? Have you ever heard such nonsense? It clearly does not make any sense at all as I have explained above.

Now David Etheredge pulls a new rabbit out of his hat. He admits that hand-built zappers can be good -- depending on how they are made -- but since The Ultimate Zapper is not well made it is a bad zapper -- that great zapper authority David Etheredge declares. Well, The Ultimate Zapper has a failure rate of only 1 in over 10,000. This is the zapper David Etheredge says is not well-made? Huh?How much more reliable can you get?

11. David Etheredge:

"As you can see from this picture, ParaZapper is securely attached inside of the durable plastic case with 4 screws.

Ken Presner: Same for The Ultmate Zapper.

"The switches and connectors are also securely soldered to the circuit board."

Ken Presner: Same for The Ultmate Zapper.

"Sorry, but cheap switches,"

Ken Presner: Make that the most expensive switch of its kind available. Not a single switch failure.

"hand wiring that can easily break,"

Ken Presner: Never happened even once in over 10,000 zappers shipped.

"hobby level resistors,"

Ken Presner: Hobbies are discussed about.

"and unmounted circuit boards"

Ken Presner: The Ultimate Zapper's board is very well mounted. Never a single problem in over 10,000 zappers shipped.

"do not represent quality in any context,"

Ken Presner: David Etheredge means in the fairy-tale world he is trying to create for people who do not know about electronics.

"especially when compared to our high quality boards and components."

Ken Presner: This has been fully discussed above. A high quality board or component does not translate into a high quality zapper. All ParaZappers are weak compared to compared to The Utlimate Zapper.

Ken Presner: The Ultimate Zapper's switch is the most expensive toggle switch of its kind available. Unmounted circuit boards? Hand wiring that can easily break? David Etheredge pulls one rabbit after the next out of his magic hat. The only problem is they are all lies. By trying to focus attention on parts -- taking the liberty to lie about them -- he may be able to deceive those who are unaware. His agenda is to try to get people's attention away from the amazing results The Ultimate Zapper produces. He is willing to say whatever it takes to do that. And that's the bottom line.

12. David Etheredge:

"The ParaZapper UZI has over 50 components on the circuit board, some of them costing almost as much as the entire set of parts that go into the so called [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "so-called" with a hyphen] ultimate zapper [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper"]."

Ken Presner: Say again? 50 components and still unable to produce one winner. David Etheredge needs to go back to the drawing board. And more lies repeated by him about the cost of parts. What else can you expect from David Etheredge? Nothing else. If you believe him then I made up the Testimonial Archive on my site and he is an electrical engineer ... and I have a bridge ...

13. David Etheredge:

"This Ultimate Zapper did not even have a label. According to the customer that traded it in to us, it was purchased in April of 2007. The claim "Machine made printed circuit boards are much cheaper to use but they produce an inferior end product." is not true as we use a lower soldering temperature. The very purpose of the printed circuit board is to improve quality and reliability. In reality, the cheap piece of generic board used in the model shown is much cheaper than our circuit boards cost and we have very few problems with component reliability"

Ken Presner: Say again? More lies from the lying liar David Etheredge? He is so desperate that he even would like people to believe The Ultimate Zapper has no label. Really? Have you had a look at the Home Page? No label? I think a visit to the eye doctor may be a good idea at this point for David Etheredge. He may have "very few problems with component reliability" but we have none. So much for his lies about the inferior quality of point-to-point wiring.

14. David Etheredge:

"The ultimate [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper" -- with a capital U] has only 9 hobby quality components on the circuit board and the volume cost for those parts is only about 95 cents, plus a switch costing a buck or so, a jack for a power connector ( also a buck or so in volume ), a battery strap costing about 50 cents, and a plastic case costing about $2.80. And you are paying how much for that custom build? Sorry, but we would consider it extremely dishonest to sell so little for so much."

Ken Presner: Say again? "sell so little for so much"? David Etheredge would consider it dishonest to tell the truth about the cost of the most important parts inside The Utlimate Zapper ... but he does not consider it dishonest to talk about my making up the Testimonial Archive, he does not consider it dishonest to misrepresent his credentials, he does not consider it dishonest to lie about the cost or parts and production, he does not consider is dishonest to imply The Ultimate Zapper has no label, he does not consider it dishonest to fear-monger about The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter, he does not consider it dishonest to take 3 features of The Ultimate Zapper for his own zapper while calling The Ultimate Zapper inferior and his own zapper superior, he does not consider it dishonest to misrepresent the wave form produced by his own zapper, he does not consider it dishonest to complain about the price of My Recovery Protocol that has saved many lives (for him $24.95 is too expensive when you're saving lives), he does not consider it dishonest to deny the fact that The Ultimate Zapper produces a very powerful Electroporation Effect, he does not consider it dishonest to make excuses for a convicted felon turned "humanitarian" who steals money from people on his website as long as he mentions the name ParaZapper is his book that sells for $99.95 ... you have to be very gullible to believe soemone with David Etheredge's track record of dishonesty.

15. David Etheredge:

"When the unloaded signal from the Ultimate zapper is observed on the oscilloscope, it looks fairly decent. Unfortunaltely, this is not the signal that needs to be examined."

Ken Presner: Say again? Now David Etheredge is lecturing on the signal that "needs to be examined" -- we don't need to examine the results people are getting -- let's not talk about unimportant things like results -- let's talk really important things liket resistors and capacitors for a moment ... yada, yada, yada ...

16. David Etheredge:

"When the loaded signal from the Ultimate zapper [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper" with capital letters], using a human body as a load, is observed on the oscilloscope, the story is told."

Ken Presner: Say again? The story is told? What story? The story about the results people have been getting for 15 years with The Ultimate Zapper?The story that is told are the lies David Etheredge does everything he can to get people to believe -- "The Cheap Parts Story".

"The waveform dips extremely negative completely violating Dr. Clark's statement "No even a single spike on negative side, because you sustain pathogen life". According to the image, the claim of 100 percent positive output is obviously completely false."

Ken Presner: Say again? "Sustain pathogen life"? In which case it is impossible for The Ultimate Zapper to produce the amazing results it has been producing for 15 years. As I say, David Etheredge needs to visit the eye doctor. My explanation of the square wave has been on my FAQ Page (#11) for years. David Etheredge's reply He ignores it. Here is a quote from #11 on my FAQ Page:

I note that David Etheredge has tried to do some oscilloscope hocus pocus on his new "Trash The Ultimate Zapper" page. The only problem with his statements that quote Dr. Hulda Clark about the square wave is that Dr. Clark was not right. The fact is that Dr. Clark was not right about everything she said in her books nor was she right about everything concerning her research. She was certainly wrong about her statement regarding "sustaining pathogen life" that David Etheredge is quoting regarding the possibility of the square wave dipping below the zero line. I have yet to read any detailed description supporting the statement regarding the "danger" of this phenomenon and, in fact, other than quoting Dr. Clark, David Etheredge provides no evidence to support this claim. Quoting Dr. Clark does not make this statement true.

The fact is that it is not true. A short spike below the zero line is normal under load. In fact there is a short, sharp spike at the top and the bottom of every zapper wave produced by every zapper from every zapper maker. This can be seen in close-ups of oscilloscope views. The ultimate irony is that this short spike does not diminish the powerful therapeutic effects of The Ultimate Zapper in any way -- as thousands of users know -- to the chagrin of David Etheredge I am sure. The Ultimate Zapper -- now replaced by the New Model SE -- is the most powerful and effective zapper in the world. I think this is probably The Ultimate Thorn in the side of David Etheredge who has not been able to figure out how to make a better zapper. So he resorts to negative marketing tactics where all else has failed.

17. David Etheredge:

"The Ultimate Zapper's frequency is advertised as 2500 Hz but as you can see below, the output is not exact. Actually, due to the hobby level components used in making the Ultimate Zapper [sic spelling mistake -- should be "The Ultimate Zapper" with a capital T], the actual frequency could be +/- about 18 percent. This is one of the poorest quality zappers that I have seen. As a comparison, the ParaZapper PLUS-2 has a tolerance of only +/- 10 Hz in the 2500 Hz range, which is less than 1/2 percent error and the CC1 is even more accurate."

Ken Presner: Say again? " ... the output is not exact"? Who says that frequency has to be exact? Oh, it must be that great authority David Etheredge. For frequency generators it is vital that the output frequency be exact, of course. But not for zappers. Resistors with a more liberal tolerance have a variable frequency around the nominal output but that changes nothing when it comes to the results people get -- which is all they care about and all that matters. People are not interested in resistor tolerance. But jealous competitors are when they are trying to make the other fellow look bad. Too bad people are getting such amazing results with those awful resistors.

18. David Etheredge:

"Based on this information, you can see that the Ultimate Zapper [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper" with a capital T] does not meet the manufacturer's claims. Seeing this, how could anyone trust his other claims such as Electroporation ( which is not possible at such low voltages according to most authorities ) and blood electrification which requires a much higher voltage according to its author, Bob Beck."

Ken Presner: My zapper is actually called The Ultimate Zapper. I guess it's just another David Etheredge typo.

Say Again? "Does not meet the manufacturer's claim"? Ya gotta be kidding. David Etheredge likes to quote "authorities" on anything and everything -- including Electroporation -- when he thinks he can get some mileage of of it -- even when the "authorities" are dead wrong. Who needs facts when you have "authorities" who know everything? That way you can park your brain under a shady tree so you don't have to think for yourself. Read the truth about The Ultimate Zapper's Electroporation Effect here. Quoting Bob Beck will also do David Etheredge no good. The Ultimate Zapper produces a very powerful Blood Electrification effect at its lower voltage. Countless testimonials from customers prove this fact -- beyond a shadow of a doubt.

19. Ken Presner:

Years ago on Curezone a new forum visitor started posting complaints about me and my service. Ooooh. David Etheredge was so happy to hear about this. He just loves repeating stories about The Ultimate Zapper -- without checking the facts. Facts? I mean, who needs facts when you can repeat a "complaint" against Ken Presner? As someone who ambulance chases on Curezone, David Etheredge was quick to pick up on this new poster's grievance against me. It was ipso facto obvious to David Etheredge that it must be legitimate. Obvious?

The "complainant" said he ordered an Ultimate Zapper but never received his order and was demanding a refund which I allegedly refused to give him. This looked like a juicy scandal that can make a competitor start to salivate -- a competitor like David Etheredge, in any case. The only problem is that it was all lies. The "complainant" had received his zapper and signed for it (on the form the signature was "Pe****on") -- AND he received a refund as well. Through a cunning ploy he was able to get his Ultimate Zapper for free -- and publicize a totally false story on Curezone to elicit the sympathy and support of Curezone readers. David Etheredge was not about to let this opportunity slip through his fingers. He pounced on it. He was only too happy to repeat the "complainant's" lies. To this day he has never admitted the truth. Well, guess what? David Etheredge is at it again. This is no surprise from someone with David Etheredge's ethics.

David Etheredge:

"We have had several phone calls from former customers of the manufacturer who complain about their "poor customer service" and "arrogant attitude".

Ken Presner: Say again? Isn't it interesting that David Etheredge says my customers are calling him to complain about me? I can imagine how he upset he must be -- presented with another opportunity to trash that nasty Ken Presner and his Ultimate Zapper.

It is very well-known in the zapper business that I offer the best customer service of any zapper maker. Hands down. Bar none. David Etheredge will never be able to convince anyone that he received a phone call from actress Karen Allen complaining that 4 hours with The Ultimate Zapper was all she needed to recover completely from Lyme -- or from any other Lyme sufferer -- or from any of the thousands of satisfied customers using The Ultimate Zapper. Who is David Etheredge trying to fool?

I think every zapper maker who is honest will admit that it is not possible to please 100% of the people 100% of the time. David Etheredge may be the only exception -- taking the honesty factor into consideration. I work 365 days a year and I do my very best. In fact, I have taken a day off in over 10 years. Only competitors like David Etheredge -- and Ken Adachi -- question my honesty -- and an occasional dissatisfied customer. The latter appear on average about once a year -- versus thousands of satisfied customers. That is pretty good odds. My reputation has been diligently created beccause I offer the best possble service -- as you can read in 368 testimonials in The Archive.

Nevertheless, that 1 in 1000 does happen -- inevitably. Prospective "problem" customers come in various guises -- and with differing demands that are next to impossible to satisfy. This can mean anything from clicking on BUY NOW and expecting delivery yesterday -- to expecting instant results in a single zapping session -- to expecting medical claims when it is against the law for me to do that -- to expecting me to solve all their life problems -- to being confrontational in emails.

No zapper can honestly tell me -- including David Etheredge -- that they have not encountered "special" prospective customers. In fact, if I feel something strange going on I refuse to take orders. Etheredge cannot pretend he has not had his share of "difficult customers" -- without lying. I have been in this business for 15 years. You cannot pull the wool over my eyes.

David Etheredge has no qualms about claiming people have complained to him about that "arrogant" Ken Presner. He doesn't have to prove a thing. All he has to do is refer to a third party "report" which he takes for granted must be true if that person went to all the trouble to inform that paragon of virtue David Etheredge about it -- the zapper world's equivalent of The National Enquirer. He is no different from those notorious defamatory sites I write about on my site. And what do we actually know about how David Etheredge conducts his business? We know a lot. David Etheredge's deceptive business practices and his lack of ethics are revealed in black and white in this expose.

David Etheredge offers a punitive 60% return fee that many of his customers have emailed me about -- then talks about poor service from that ubiquitous Ken Presner? He says his 60% return fee is just there to scare customers. And then he has the nerve to quote "others" as calling me arrogant. For someone with Davod Etheredge's track record for lying and poor service, and for publicly displayed arrogance both on his site and on Curezone forums, David Etheredge has a very high opinion of himself -- one that is not shared by the many customers and forum posters who continue to email me.

David Etheredge declares on his site that he even inspects post marks on returns and if a return is post marked after day 10 then the axe falls. And then David Etheredge has the nerve to throw mud over the fence. He is wallowing in it. When he throws mud over my fence it comes back to him by the trailer load -- one way or another. What goes around has a nasty habit of coming back to you. If you sow the seeds of righteousness with your competitors it will will come back to you. If you sow the seeds of ill will and tell lies this will also come back to you. It's just as simple as that.

"The following site has even more recent complaints about problems with zap.intergate.ca."

That's nice to know. It's nice to know that David Etheredge is keen to report alleged complaints about my site -- "reports" that are not only fraudulent but are posted to sites owned by convicted criminals. He also leaves it to the very end of his "report" to mention that two of the sites where these fraudulent "reports" were posted have no actual "reports" to report when you click on the links he provides. As though this were irrelevant. He wants to leave the impression that these are bona fide complaints. He prefers to publish a fictional plot. It sounds so much better -- to his ears.

The reason why these "reports" are no longer accessible when you click is that, although these "complaint" sites are reputed to NEVER take down any complaints from their sites because "reports" create advertising revenue, I proved to the owner of these two sites that they were fraudulent "reports" and he removed them quickly from both sites. Chasing after other criminal sites is an exercise in masochism that I chose not to waste time in pursuing.

David Etheredge also "forgot" to publish another "irrelevant" detail -- that these "reports" are not plural at all. They are actually a single report that appears on a number of so-called "report" sites posted on different dates by the same person. He reports these "reports" on his site with his usual tone of authority, as though there were a bevy of complaints against The Ultimate Zapper. He is only too eager to leave this false impression. There is only one "report" in question and it is totally fraudulent.

No lie is too big for David Etheredge to publish. The truth has no place on his anti Ultimate Zapper page. It is designed to hook gullible readers into ordering his zapper -- backed by his 60% return penality. David Eteherdge continues to show he is a pathetic and unscrupulous competitor who will say ANYTHING to get ahead.

To read more about these fraudulent reports click here.

"Report: Ken Presner Ultimate Zapper [link]."

"Some additional links"

"CureZone [link]"

"CureZone [link]"

"CureZone [link]"

"CureZone [link]"

"Additional information: complaint board [link]. This complaint appears to have been removed"

Ken Presner: Duuuh. "... appears to have been removed ..." This is not an appearance. It was removed. Note that this insightful observation appears at the end of all of David Etheredge's "documentation" -- a truly meticulous electrical engineer at work here -- and quite the manipulator. I imagine he hopes people won't read that far down the page and ask the question "Gee, I wonder why the "reports" were removed from those sites?"

20. David Etheredge:

"While the zapper does work to some extent"

Ken Presner: Say again? "To some extent"? That's not what thousands of satified users are saying and what is reflected in 458 unsolicited testimonials in the Testimonial Archive. That's the begrudging comment of a jealous competitor. Who are you going to believe? Actress Karen Allen who got rid of her Lyme disease after using The Ultimate Zapper for only 4 hours after suffering from Lyme for years -- or David Etheredge?

"and has a following,"

Ken Presner: Say again? "Has a following"? Why on earth would it "have a following" if it were the terrible product that David Etheredge portrays it as being? According to sales figures anounced by Don Croft of Terminator that used to be the world's #1 selling zapper, The Ultimate Zapper has overtaken it and has become the world's #1 selling zapper. David Etheredge got it right -- The Ultimate Zapper has "a following".

"we do not feel that it matches up to the hype."

Ken Presner: Say again? "We"? Oh, he is referring to himself. "Matches up"? What the heck does that mean? Did he do field testing with The Ultimate Zapper to arrive at this authoritative statement? "The hype."? What hype? Is he referring to the 368 unsolicited testimonials that he is probably not very interested in reading? " ... work to some extent ... " That reminds me of his final admission regarding the Testimonial Archive on my site. After saying authoritatively that I made them all up he revised his authoritative statement by saying " ... some of them may be true ... " when he realized how inane his first authoritative statement sounded. I mean, who could ever believe a single word uttered by David Etheredge?

Read the testimonials and come to your own conclusions about the extent to which The Ultimate Zapper works and the extent to which satisfied customers "hype" the results they obtain. You may note that on the home page I actually mute my comments about testimonials in favor of people reading the testimonials themselves. If there is any hype on my site it clearly comes from my customers who are thrilled with the results they are getting.

"We are only trying to show the inferior aspects of this zapper"

Ken Presner: Say again? "We"? Oh, David Etheredge is referring to himself. The word "I" is only a small one. I think it can fit into his dictionary.

"We're only trying to show the inferior aspects of this zapper [David Etheredge means The Ultimate Zapper]." That's very kind of him to provide this public service. Of course, his statement implies that there are "aspects" to The Ultimate Zapper that are not "inferior". After all, why try to show the superior "apsects" of "this zapper". That could get people thinking The Ultimate Zapper is not so bad after all. We wouldn't want that to happen. I wonder what "aspects" David Etherdge is referring to? Is he referring the "aspects" he just "borrowed" from The Ultimate Zapper and added to his own zapper?

I wonder how the "inferior aspects" David Etheredge refers to are able to produce the amazing results that people are reporting? They are obviously contributing to The Ultimate Zapper's success and popularity. I can only imagine how its superior "aspects" are adding to its amazing synergy and the results people are raving about. David Etheredge has an exquisite talent for putting both of his feet in his mouth at the same time. Sometimes I wonder if he even thinks about what he publishes before he uploads to his sight.

"we do not feel that it matches up to the hype."

Ken Presner: Say again? "We"? Oh, he is referring to himself -- again. Have a look at 368 unsolicited "hype" testimonials sent in to me-- then email me with your comments. David Etheredge has 9 testimonials on his site -- the most dramatic about zapping his pet fish. I'm not joking.

"and the high price that is reaped through hype."

Ken Presner: Oooooh. That hurts. Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper has the highest cost of production of any zapper on the market -- and he still manages to make a profit. Terrible.

"the truth is that if that zapper"

Ken Presner: Say again? "That Zapper". Ooooh. David Etheredge -- nasty man, "that man".

"was the best, we would be producing it"

Ken Presner: Say again? David Etheredge takes 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's 11 features then talks about "if that zapper was the best ... we would be producing it" That's exactly what he is trying to do -- while disclaiming this obvious fact.

"and promoting it as would everyone else in the business."

Ken Presner: Well, if there is a better example of crazy logic on any zapper site I have not found it yet. According to David Etheredge, all zapper makers are trolling other zapper sites so they can find the best zapper so they can copy it -- just like he is doing by taking 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's features. According to David Etheredge, all zapper makers are as uncreative and unscrupuous and predatory as he is. He is even trying to take the name of my zapper while putting my zapper's name in lower case to make it look generic. David Etheredge is as transparent a manipulator as a pane of Windexed glass.

"Also, note that there are a lot of other zappers out there and you do not see us posting web pages about them."

Ken Presner: Gee, I wonder why? Could it just be because The Ultimate Zapper has the highest ratings of any zapper in the world and has a wider acceptance than any other zapper in the world with over 753 website linking into my site versus 8 for his site? He is not only an inveterate liar, an unethical and unscrupulous competitor, he is also a desperate competitor.

"Their claim"

Ken Presner: Say again? "Their"? Oh, he must be referring to me. "Claim"? This is not a claim. David Etheredge stated in black and white on Curezone that The Ultimate Zapper is the "best single frequency zapper".

"that we supported their product was from before we found out what was inside of it."

Ken Presner: Say again? Oh, I get it. He has to backtrack now. Re-writing history once he realized he was sending me customers. Thanks.

"This is certainly not a product that we could endorse."

Ken Presner: Say again? Why in the world would he endorse the best zapper in the world -- unless it was done inadvertently on Curezone. Oooops. Got to try to erase that one. Did a big blooper there.

"There are even some competing zappers and manufacturers that we endorse when asked about them."

Ken Presner: David Etheredge endorsed The Ultimate Zapper without being asked. He did this spontaneously on Curezone. Before he realized what he had done. Ooooh, spontaneity can be dangerous.

21. David Etheredge:

"Impressive diagram? NO! The competitor is only showing the diagram of a single component (a 555 timer) that is used in almost every single cheap zapper ever made. Nothing special, it just looks impressive to the unknowing user. "

Ken Presner: Say again? Who said it was an "impressive diagram"? I said it was at the heart of The Ultimate Zapper. And so it is. Just a fact. THe 555 CMOS timer chip is now also being deprectaed by David Etheredge -- its found in "every single cheap zapper ever made"? And what about expensive zappers? Why do makers of expensive zapper use the CMOS if it is no good? Read the truth about the amazing 555 CMOS timer chip here. The Ultimate Zapper uses the superior TTL version, by the way. Sorry to point out another positive thing about The Ultimate Zapper. I hate to embarrass David Etheredge any more than necessary. Wikipedia says about the 55 CMOS timer chip that "As of 2003, it is estimated that 1 billion units are manufactured every year." Well, sorry, it can't be as bad as David Etheredge tries to make out, eh.

22. David Etheredge

"If we were to post the diagram of the main chip that is used in our ParaZapperCC1, and ParaZapperUZI it would be well over 100 times more complex than this diagram."

Ken Presner: Too bad it does not produce the superior results that The Ultimate Zapper does -- which does not depend on the chip only, of course, but on the synergy of its 11 features. David Etheredge needs to get busy -- back to the drawing board.

23. David Etheredge:

"If you would like a top quality zapper from a reliable company, see: http://www.petzapper.com/"

Ken Presner: Ooooh. Now we get to the punch line. It's time to place an order for a ParaZapper that takes 3 features from that no-darn-good Ultimate Zapper.

24. David Etheredge:

"Even though we do not think much of the ultimate zapper [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper" with capital letters],"

Ken Presner: Say again? He means "I" but cannot bring himself to abandon the illusion that he is a plural, not a singular. He does not think much of the ultimate zapper -- in lower case no capitals you may note. Of course not. His site is rated at #14,000,000 in the US while The Ultimate Zapper site is rated at #300,000 in the US. He has to say SOMETHING to trash The Ultimate Zapper. He has to figure out SOME way to get ahead of the popularity of my zapper. He does not think much of it? And he thinks that carries weight with the zapper-buying public versus the thousands of satisfied users of The Ultimate Zapper with its return rate of less than 1%? David Etheredge will say ANYTHING -- whatever it takes -- to talk my zapper down. The one thing he has not factored into the equation is one small thing -- the law of the universe. Karma, What goes around comes around.

"if you feel that you must have that function,"

Ken Presner: Say again? The Ultimate Zapper is no longer a zapper? It is a "function"? Wait. Further down his page David Etheredge calls it a "mode". He already talked about its "aspects" and often refers to it as a device with "functionality" and as "that zapper" and as a generic "ultimate zapper". Stop there. What is The Ultimate Zapper, actually? Is it a zapper? Or is it that zapper? Or is it a device with functionality. Or is it an ultimate zapper?

Or is it a function? Or is it a mode? Or is it an aspect? David Etheredge cannot even agree with himself on what the heck to call The Ultimate Zapper. Calling it The Ultimate Zapper would stick in his craw and he might get a case of indigestion. I mean, you have to start laughing at some point when you read David Etheredge. He is like a zapper sit-com. He calls me "they" and "them" and "their" and "the competitor". He calls himself "him" and "we". How can you trust someone who cannot even call simple things by their real name -- including himself?

David Etheredge has probably not noticed that The Ultimate Zapper is actually a real live zapper called The Ultimate Zapper with a unique 11-feature formula -- and lots of good Karma -- and thousands of satisfied customers with a worldwide network of distributors.

"we even provide a model that beats their Ultimate Zapper hands down!"

Ken Presner: Here's that "we" again. Oh, I see. The Ultimate Zapper is trash but "we" have a better model -- that just happens to take 3 of The Ultimate Zapper's features. Huh? His new model beats a zapper he calls worthless? Well, I imagine that should not be very hard to do, eh. Ooooh, but read a bit further to find out the truth about David Etheredge's new zapper. Sorry, I should say "their" new zapper. I forgot. David Etheredge is actually a plural person.

"See ParaZapper UZI the real ultimate zapper, it has 6 different zappers built into one."

Ken Presner: Say again? You mean all those other models he has been selling are not good enough? But I thought they were great zappers? What happened all of a sudden? Into the garbage can now? You now need a 6-in-one? Why would you need 6 if he had one that was good enough? The Ultimate Zapper is only one. It has been doing great for many years -- with lots of very satisfied customers that back it to the hilt.

25. David Etheredge:

"It includes the exact 90 percent duty cycle at 2020 Hz ( which is a lower frequency than even the ultimate zapper [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "The Ultimate Zapper" with capital letters] provides ), with an accuracy of 0.5 percent ( way more accurate than the ultimate zapper ), and top quality, high reliability construction. We do not offer the ultimate mode because it is any better, but only to give you a choice."

Ken Presner: Say again? You mean David Etheredge is throwing "Dr. Clark's specifications" in the garbage can -- after all his protestations and after accusing me of doing that very thing? And copying The Ultimate Zapper to do so? Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Aw shucks. I just don't know what to say. How about a simple thank-you.

As a mattrer [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be ";matter"] of point, the "ultimate mode is the least preferred mode among the users who have told us which modes that they like."

Ken Presner: Say again? You mean all those other models David Etheredge has been selling are not good enough? But I thought they were great zappers? What happened all of a sudden? Into the garbage can now? You now need a 6-in-one? Why would you need 6 if one was good enough? The Ultimate Zapper is only one. It has been doing great for many years -- with lots of very satisfied customers that back it to the hilt.

Ken Presner: Ahhh. Let's trash The Ultimate Zapper. Please note that it is not really a zapper. He has transformed it into a "mode". Then David Etheredge takes 3 of its features for is own zapper -- then he says those features don't improve the zapper at all, in any case -- then he says customers prefer this new model the least of all -- oh, sorry, it's only a "mode" not a model. Huh? Say again? Do you believe all of this convoluted nonsense -- or anything David Etheredge says? He has an exquite talent for shredding his own credibility. No need for an outside helping hand.

"The ParaZapper UZI offers functionallity [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "functionality" with only one l] that exceeds any zapper in its price range, on the market."

Ken Presner: Say again? Have a look at the Zapper Comparison Charts. They show very clearly that not only is the UZI more expensive in most of its versions than The Ultimate Zapper it does not shine a light to The Ultimatye Zapper that is clearly on the top of the zapper heap -- which is why it has been so successful. In fact, as I discuss on this page, the UZI is not really a zpaper at all. It is a frequency generator -- a very complicate and time-consuming device to use. In fact, Hulda Clark herself wrote that most people looking for a zapper should eschew complicated and expensive frequency generators in favor of a good zapper. So much for all of David Etheredge's empty talk about following "Dr. Clark's specifications".

26. David Etheredge:

"David Etheredge has had extensive experience in product development since the 1970's. For a list of his electronics design products, click here."

Ken Presner: Did you notice David Etheredge he cannot even say "I" when reffing to his own resume? He refers to himself in the third person singular, and in the first person plural ("we") in many other instances. Hmmm. He does not mention that these statements about his credentials are a direct response to my revelation that David Etheredge has been misrepresenting himself as an accredited electrical engineer for all these years. He took courses in electronics and has experience in electronics design -- no rocket science here -- but he IS NOT an electrical engineer.

"For a list of his electronics software and programming experience, click here."

Ken Presner: Again, not the use of the third person singular -- as though he were talking about someone else, not himself. I find this very strange. Programming? Should I list my computer programming training and all the computer programming projects I have worked on? This is totally irrelevant -- except to try to create some kind of credibility for himself after lying about his credentials for years.

27. David Etheredge:

"All ParaZapper products are made with 100 percent ROHS compliant components and are free of lead and other hazardous materials. We have built to this standard for a long time, it is not new to us. "

Ken Presner: I have never said or even implied that this was new to David Etheredge. This is another of his many paper tigers.

28. David Etheredge:

"The competitor also offers a convient [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be "convenient"] comparison chart where he only shows the 2 least expensive models that we offer and he only compares the characteristics that he claims are the best. Conveniently, he completely ignores our 3 best models that surpass his in practically every way. ParaZapper UZI offers several frequencies ( including several Rife Frequencies ) that are lower than the Ultimate Zapper's [sic -- spelling mistake -- this should be The Ultimate Zapper's with a capital T] frequency, and that actually produces a genuine positive offset."

Ken Presner: " ... a genuine positive offset." Just like The Ultimate Zapper's square wave. "The competitor"? David Etheredge must be referring to me. As you can clearly see in the Zapper Comparison Charts, David Etheredge's UZI is right there beside his basic and plus models -- one more weak zapper added to his stable of weak zappers. But wait. With all those frequencies the UZI doesn't look like a zapper at all. It isn't. It is actually a frequency generator. Uh, oh. This is a whole new ball game. David Etheredge has just stepped into quicksand.

See #4 and #5 on the FAQ page for an explanation of the difference between zappers and frequency generators. The latter are a very complicated and expensive route to take. Look at David Etheredge's zapping schedule. People will actually have the time to zap at all those frequencies? That's what frequency generators are all about. Complications. Hulda Clark knew this and said most people will end up choosing the zapper option -- not the frequency generator option. David Etheredge forgot to mention this. The frequency genetarot option is very time-consuming and also much more expensive than zapping with The Ultimate Zapper that requires zapping for only 15 seconds to begin with -- working up to a few minutes.

"Characteristics" I "claim" are the best? View the Zapper Comparison Charts and judge for yourself. Does my list of features look like a "claim" to you? Do they look like "characteristics"? Scan all of the features and scan all of the zappers. Never mind what David Etheredge would like you to think about my Zapper Comparison Charts. He thinks that by calling features "characteristics" that they are no longer features. This is the same kind of deception that we find throughout David Etheredge's anti Ultimate Zapper page. He wants people to think that the features in my charts do not represent the features that make zappers effective -- while taking 3 of those features for his own zapper. Hypocrisy and duplicity also characterize David Etheredge's modus operandi. Have a look at The Charts and judge for yourself.

And finally. The smoking gun. The Ultimate Zapper is not so ultimate. David Etheredge is adding 3 of its features to create his best zapper -- but just to satisfy misguided customers who want to purchase what he and they already know is an inferior zapper. Huh?

Now David Etheredge's "3 best models ... surpass his [Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper] in practically every way." Say again? "... surpass ... in practically every way [The Ultimate Zapper]"? But I thought The Ultimate Zapper was an inferior zapper not worth copying except to provide an inferior zapper to customers who demand it? Trying to surpass an inferior zapper? Ah, how exqusite. David Etheredge has put his 2 feet in his mouth at the same time -- once again.

For an expose of David Etheredge's
Deceptive Marketing
click here

4. David Etheredge
NAQ (never asked questions)

1. Why did David Etheredge endorse The Ultimate Zapper and then try to retract his endorsement?

2. Why is David Etheredge now trying to copy The Ultimate Zapper?

3. Why is David Etheredge adding the name of The Ultimate Zapper to his own zapper?

4. Why do electronics experts endorse The Ultimate Zapper?

5. Why does Don Croft who created the Terminator zapper endorse The Ultimate Zapper?

6. Why has David Etheredge devoted so much effort to waging an unprovoked war against The Ultimate Zapper over a period of many years -- while studiously ignoring the mountain of positive reports from satisfied customers about The Ultimate Zapper's effectiveness -- and its worldwide acceptance?

7. Why does David Etheredge ignore that The Ultimate Zapper has been reported by practitioners all over the world to be effective for treating many serious conditions? Doctors are using it in hospitals and clinics to treat malaria that is eliminated in only 6 days with my zapper -- as well as using it to treat HIV and cancer and many, many other conditions.

8. Why does David Etheredge ignore the mountain of clinical evidence supporting The Ultimate Zapper -- preferring to talk about the cost of resistors and capacitors while publishing totally false information about the cost of production for The Ultimate Zapper?

9. Why does David Etheredge restrict his zapper discussion to the one thing that matters least to zapper users -- electronic circuitry -- while ignoring the one thing that matters most to people -- The Ultimate Zapper's amazing results?

10. Why did actress Karen Allen's doctor recommend The Ultimate Zapper treat her Lyme disease?

11. Why did Karen Allen get such amazing results with The Ultimate Zapper for Lyme disease -- after only 4 hours zapping?

12. Why did Karen Allen do an unsolicited interview publicizing me and The Ultimate Zapper?

13. Why did Karen Allen's friends get the same amazing results with her Ultimate Zapper for Lyme disease as Karen did?

14. Why does David Etheredge say I made up the 368 unsolicited testimonials (and counting) in the Testimonial Archive that bear witness to The Ultimate Zapper's phenomenal success.

15. Why do thousands of customers in over 60 countries say The Ultimate Zapper is the best zapper they ever used?

16. Why does The Ultimate Zapper have a worldwide network of distributors with a expanding clientele of satisfied users?

17. Why does The Ultimate Zapper have a return rate of less than 1%.

18. Why does The Ultimate Zapper site have a very high internet ranking -- in the top 1% of all internet sites worldwide -- while the ParaZapper site has a very low internet ranking? This is confirmed by Alexa, the internet rating agency.

19. Why is David Etheredge trying to improve his internet ranking by using the cunning ploy of taking the name of my zapper to piggy-back onto the popularity of The Ultimate Zapper -- instead of improving his ranking through good old honest hard work?

20. Why does The Ultimate Zapper site have 753 other sites linking into it -- far more than any other zapper site in the world -- while the ParaZapper site has only 8 other sites linking into it?

21. Why has David Etheredge been falsifying his own credentials for years?

22. Why does David Etheredge quote fraudulent reports from sites owned by convicted criminals to try to discredit The Ultimate Zapper?

23. Over the past 15 years I have received universal thanks from customers and practitioners. There has been a single voice railing relentlessly against The Ultimate Zapper. It has not been from a customer or a practitioner. It has been from David Etheredge -- an obviously jealous competitor. Who is he fooling Anyone? Read more.

24. Why do so many people email me saying that my site rings true?

25. Why have many spiritually aware people reported to me that they have been guided to my site above all other zapper sites?

Furthermore ...

26. Why would David Etheredge bother producing a stable full of zappers if he had one model that was really effective?

27. Why does David Etheredge claim his zapper must be more effective than The Ultimate Zapper because of its complexity? The Charts show it most definitely is not. The simplicity of The Ultimate Zapper is precisely what creates its power and its amazing effectiveness. This simplicity in concept is translated into the amazing synergy of its 11 features.

28. Why does David Etheredge pander to a well-known convicted felon -- a larcenist turned author who endorsed David Etheredge's zapper? And why does he make excuses for this felon's criminal activity?

29. Why does David Etheredge ambulance chase on Curezone and use its forums for commercial purposes in contravention of forum rules?

30. I recovered from Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease. David Etheredge has been publishing dangerously false information for years on Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease as well as other diseases and serious conditions -- as well as a lot of harmless outright nonsense. Why does he try to project an aura of authority on health matters he knows nothing about and has no credentials for?

31. Why has David Etheredge removed countless comments on health issues from his site after I publicized they were false?

32. In response to my revelation that David Etheredge has been falsifying his credentials he is now publishing portions of his c.v. to cover up the truth that he is not an electrical engineer as he previously alleged. Why does he consistently lie about himself?

33. Who does David Etheredge think he is fooling?

5.PARAZAPPER -- DECEPTIVE MARKETING EXPOSE here

TRIAL OFFER

kenpresner @hotmail.com

ORDER HERE

MAIN MENU

• 
• kenpresner
  @hotmail.com
• Ordering
• Trial Offer
• Distributors & Referrals
• Instructions
• Comparison Charts
• Testimonials
• My Recovery Protocol
• FAQ